The Egalitarian Society

We have been brainwashed by our time. Not that that is necessarily a negative thing. But it may help us to gain perspective and refrain from judging people who came before or other cultures today when they do not embody the same ideals as us.

An example of this is western civilization's belief in egalitarianism. Today, we operate under the paradigm that all government positions, job hirings, promotions, spots to study at a college, and judicial decisions should be decided on a merit basis and that every other way of choosing someone over another is ethically wrong. I am not disputing that this could be true, I just want to point out the fact that this is not the only approach that one can take. For most of human civilization, such decisions were based on relationship ties, not merit. Your fitness for a position was not a function of how good you could do a job but your identity, your membership in a group. This society has often been termed the corporate society. It is apparent in tribal societies, pre-modern European society, and is in fact alive today in western society even if we do not recognize it. Today we feel an aversion to a politician who advances a relative and immediately label it as nepotism and unfair. What we may not realize is that this was normal practice. It was expected that decisions should be made in this manner. On another level, society was understood to only be able to function on a class basis. One belongs to a certain class that has certain responsibilities. Society would not function if anybody could do whatever they wanted. Important responsibilities would be neglected since no one wants to do the bottom jobs.

Paradox

"Je edler ein Ding in seiner Vollkommenheit", sagt ein hebräischer Schriftsteller, "desto gräßlicher in seiner Verwesung." Ein verfaultes Holz ist so scheußlich nicht als eine verwesete Blume; diese nicht so ekelhaft als ein verfaultes Tier; und dieses so gräßlich nicht als der Mensch in seiner Verwesung. So auch mit Kultur und Aufklärung. Je edler in ihrer Blüte; desto abscheulicher in ihrer Verwesung und Verderbtheit. Mißbrauch der Aufklärung schwächt das moralische Gefühl, führt zu Hartsinn, Egoismus, Irreligion und Anarchie. Misbrauch der Kultur erzeuget Üppigkeit, Gleisnerei, Weichlichkeit, Aberglauben, und Sklaverei."

(The more refined a thing is in its perfectness, says a Hebraic writer, the more gruesome it is in its decay. Rotting wood is not as disgusting as a withered flower, and a flower not as repulsive as decaying animal. An animal is finally less abhorrent than a rotting human. It is likewise with culture and enlightenment. The more noble it is in its blossom, the more abhorrent it is in its decay and decadence. Abuse of enlightenment weakens the moral sense, leads to obstinance, egotism, irreligion, and anarchy. Abuse of culture fosters luxury, mushiness, superstition, and slavery.)

There are many thoughts I have on this quote. Although it may be wrong to take Mendelssohn's discussion of a topic (enlightenment) that has a particular meaning to his period (critical thinking) I believe it is not too much of a stretch to apply it to myself. Francis Bacon said that "a little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion." I think that mankind is prone to excess. Once he gets it into his mind that he is capable of seeing contradictions in belief, how some things work, and so forth, he thinks that he can critique everything. He soon realizes (hopefully) that this is not the case and, in fact, such an attitude causes harm. Just as God's ways are not our ways, I think that even what humans think is comprehensible reality may not be so comprehensible and man may never truly be able to dispense with mystery, awe, and ignorance when it comes to existence.

Discussion topic

Anger is merely a strategy to help us avoid sadness. Discuss.